Crate regex_automata

Expand description

A low level regular expression library that uses deterministic finite automata. It supports a rich syntax with Unicode support, has extensive options for configuring the best space vs time trade off for your use case and provides support for cheap deserialization of automata for use in no_std environments.

Overview

This section gives a brief overview of the primary types in this crate:

A Regex provides a way to search for matches of a regular expression. This includes iterating over matches with both the start and end positions of each match.
A RegexBuilder provides a way configure many compilation options for a regex.
A DenseDFA provides low level access to a DFA that uses a dense representation (uses lots of space, but fast searching).
A SparseDFA provides the same API as a DenseDFA, but uses a sparse representation (uses less space, but slower matching).
A DFA trait that defines an interface that all DFAs must implement.
Both dense DFAs and sparse DFAs support serialization to raw bytes and cheap deserialization.

Example: basic regex searching

This example shows how to compile a regex using the default configuration and then use it to find matches in a byte string:

use regex_automata::Regex;

let re = Regex::new(r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}").unwrap();
let text = b"2018-12-24 2016-10-08";
let matches: Vec<(usize, usize)> = re.find_iter(text).collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![(0, 10), (11, 21)]);

Example: use sparse DFAs

By default, compiling a regex will use dense DFAs internally. This uses more memory, but executes searches more quickly. If you can abide slower searches (somewhere around 3-5x), then sparse DFAs might make more sense since they can use significantly less space.

Using sparse DFAs is as easy as using Regex::new_sparse instead of Regex::new:

use regex_automata::Regex;

let re = Regex::new_sparse(r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}").unwrap();
let text = b"2018-12-24 2016-10-08";
let matches: Vec<(usize, usize)> = re.find_iter(text).collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![(0, 10), (11, 21)]);

If you already have dense DFAs for some reason, they can be converted to sparse DFAs and used to build a new Regex. For example:

use regex_automata::Regex;

let dense_re = Regex::new(r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}").unwrap();
let sparse_re = Regex::from_dfas(
    dense_re.forward().to_sparse()?,
    dense_re.reverse().to_sparse()?,
);
let text = b"2018-12-24 2016-10-08";
let matches: Vec<(usize, usize)> = sparse_re.find_iter(text).collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![(0, 10), (11, 21)]);

Example: deserialize a DFA

This shows how to first serialize a DFA into raw bytes, and then deserialize those raw bytes back into a DFA. While this particular example is a bit contrived, this same technique can be used in your program to deserialize a DFA at start up time or by memory mapping a file. In particular, deserialization is guaranteed to be cheap because it will always be a constant time operation.

use regex_automata::{DenseDFA, Regex};

let re1 = Regex::new(r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}").unwrap();
// serialize both the forward and reverse DFAs, see note below
let fwd_bytes = re1.forward().to_u16()?.to_bytes_native_endian()?;
let rev_bytes = re1.reverse().to_u16()?.to_bytes_native_endian()?;
// now deserialize both---we need to specify the correct type!
let fwd: DenseDFA<&[u16], u16> = unsafe { DenseDFA::from_bytes(&fwd_bytes) };
let rev: DenseDFA<&[u16], u16> = unsafe { DenseDFA::from_bytes(&rev_bytes) };
// finally, reconstruct our regex
let re2 = Regex::from_dfas(fwd, rev);

// we can use it like normal
let text = b"2018-12-24 2016-10-08";
let matches: Vec<(usize, usize)> = re2.find_iter(text).collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![(0, 10), (11, 21)]);

There are a few points worth noting here:

We need to extract the raw DFAs used by the regex and serialize those. You can build the DFAs manually yourself using dense::Builder, but using the DFAs from a Regex guarantees that the DFAs are built correctly.
We specifically convert the dense DFA to a representation that uses u16 for its state identifiers using DenseDFA::to_u16. While this isn’t strictly necessary, if we skipped this step, then the serialized bytes would use usize for state identifiers, which does not have a fixed size. Using u16 ensures that we can deserialize this DFA even on platforms with a smaller pointer size. If our DFA is too big for u16 state identifiers, then one can use u32 or u64.
To convert the DFA to raw bytes, we use the to_bytes_native_endian method. In practice, you’ll want to use either DenseDFA::to_bytes_little_endian or DenseDFA::to_bytes_big_endian, depending on which platform you’re deserializing your DFA from. If you intend to deserialize on either platform, then you’ll need to serialize both and deserialize the right one depending on your target’s endianness.
Deserializing a DFA requires the use of unsafe because the raw bytes must be trusted. In particular, while some degree of sanity checks are performed, nothing guarantees the integrity of the DFA’s transition table since deserialization is a constant time operation. Since searching with a DFA must be able to follow transitions blindly for performance reasons, giving incorrect bytes to the deserialization API can result in memory unsafety.

The same process can be achieved with sparse DFAs as well:

use regex_automata::{SparseDFA, Regex};

let re1 = Regex::new(r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}").unwrap();
// serialize both
let fwd_bytes = re1.forward().to_u16()?.to_sparse()?.to_bytes_native_endian()?;
let rev_bytes = re1.reverse().to_u16()?.to_sparse()?.to_bytes_native_endian()?;
// now deserialize both---we need to specify the correct type!
let fwd: SparseDFA<&[u8], u16> = unsafe { SparseDFA::from_bytes(&fwd_bytes) };
let rev: SparseDFA<&[u8], u16> = unsafe { SparseDFA::from_bytes(&rev_bytes) };
// finally, reconstruct our regex
let re2 = Regex::from_dfas(fwd, rev);

// we can use it like normal
let text = b"2018-12-24 2016-10-08";
let matches: Vec<(usize, usize)> = re2.find_iter(text).collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![(0, 10), (11, 21)]);

Note that unlike dense DFAs, sparse DFAs have no alignment requirements. Conversely, dense DFAs must be be aligned to the same alignment as their state identifier representation.

Support for `no_std`

This crate comes with a std feature that is enabled by default. When the std feature is enabled, the API of this crate will include the facilities necessary for compiling, serializing, deserializing and searching with regular expressions. When the std feature is disabled, the API of this crate will shrink such that it only includes the facilities necessary for deserializing and searching with regular expressions.

The intended workflow for no_std environments is thus as follows:

Write a program with the std feature that compiles and serializes a regular expression. Serialization should only happen after first converting the DFAs to use a fixed size state identifier instead of the default usize. You may also need to serialize both little and big endian versions of each DFA. (So that’s 4 DFAs in total for each regex.)
In your no_std environment, follow the examples above for deserializing your previously serialized DFAs into regexes. You can then search with them as you would any regex.

Deserialization can happen anywhere. For example, with bytes embedded into a binary or with a file memory mapped at runtime.

Note that the ucd-generate tool will do the first step for you with its dfa or regex sub-commands.

Syntax

This crate supports the same syntax as the regex crate, since they share the same parser. You can find an exhaustive list of supported syntax in the documentation for the regex crate.

Currently, there are a couple limitations. In general, this crate does not support zero-width assertions, although they may be added in the future. This includes:

Anchors such as ^, $, \A and \z.
Word boundary assertions such as \b and \B.

It is possible to run a search that is anchored at the beginning of the input. To do that, set the RegexBuilder::anchored option when building a regex. By default, all searches are unanchored.

Differences with the regex crate

The main goal of the regex crate is to serve as a general purpose regular expression engine. It aims to automatically balance low compile times, fast search times and low memory usage, while also providing a convenient API for users. In contrast, this crate provides a lower level regular expression interface that is a bit less convenient while providing more explicit control over memory usage and search times.

Here are some specific negative differences:

Compilation can take an exponential amount of time and space in the size of the regex pattern. While most patterns do not exhibit worst case exponential time, such patterns do exist. For example, [01]*1[01]{N} will build a DFA with 2^(N+1) states. For this reason, untrusted patterns should not be compiled with this library. (In the future, the API may expose an option to return an error if the DFA gets too big.)
This crate does not support sub-match extraction, which can be achieved with the regex crate’s “captures” API. This may be added in the future, but is unlikely.
While the regex crate doesn’t necessarily sport fast compilation times, the regexes in this crate are almost universally slow to compile, especially when they contain large Unicode character classes. For example, on my system, compiling \w{3} with byte classes enabled takes just over 1 second and almost 5MB of memory! (Compiling a sparse regex takes about the same time but only uses about 500KB of memory.) Conversly, compiling the same regex without Unicode support, e.g., (?-u)\w{3}, takes under 1 millisecond and less than 5KB of memory. For this reason, you should only use Unicode character classes if you absolutely need them!
This crate does not support regex sets.
This crate does not support zero-width assertions such as ^, $, \b or \B.
As a lower level crate, this library does not do literal optimizations. In exchange, you get predictable performance regardless of input. The philosophy here is that literal optimizations should be applied at a higher level, although there is no easy support for this in the ecosystem yet.
There is no &str API like in the regex crate. In this crate, all APIs operate on &[u8]. By default, match indices are guaranteed to fall on UTF-8 boundaries, unless RegexBuilder::allow_invalid_utf8 is enabled.

With some of the downsides out of the way, here are some positive differences:

Both dense and sparse DFAs can be serialized to raw bytes, and then cheaply deserialized. Deserialization always takes constant time since searching can be performed directly on the raw serialized bytes of a DFA.
This crate was specifically designed so that the searching phase of a DFA has minimal runtime requirements, and can therefore be used in no_std environments. While no_std environments cannot compile regexes, they can deserialize pre-compiled regexes.
Since this crate builds DFAs ahead of time, it will generally out-perform the regex crate on equivalent tasks. The performance difference is likely not large. However, because of a complex set of optimizations in the regex crate (like literal optimizations), an accurate performance comparison may be difficult to do.
Sparse DFAs provide a way to build a DFA ahead of time that sacrifices search performance a small amount, but uses much less storage space. Potentially even less than what the regex crate uses.
This crate exposes DFAs directly, such as DenseDFA and SparseDFA, which enables one to do less work in some cases. For example, if you only need the end of a match and not the start of a match, then you can use a DFA directly without building a Regex, which always requires a second DFA to find the start of a match.
Aside from choosing between dense and sparse DFAs, there are several options for configuring the space usage vs search time trade off. These include things like choosing a smaller state identifier representation, to premultiplying state identifiers and splitting a DFA’s alphabet into equivalence classes. Finally, DFA minimization is also provided, but can increase compilation times dramatically.